TinyMCE IE 8 usability issue

by Jesse 12. June 2009 09:06

I am a big TinyMCE fan, and moved from FCKEditor years ago due to its light-weight, fast and compability with different browsers. But recently found a usability issue when using its browsing server functions, the popup browsing window is behand TinyMCE windows. I though it was something wrong with my custom image browser, but it is actually happening on its demo site.

http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/examples_im/example_01.php

I am hoping TinyMCE developers can fix it asap.

 

Bug is reported on https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&aid=2805302&group_id=103281&atid=635682

 

update:

It looks like developing team not interesting the bug reported. I found a work around by enabling inlinepopup plugin. Basic it makes the TinyMCE popup windows always on the top of parent windown, same to showmodal method.

Tags: , , , ,
Categories: Coding | ASP .NET

Fix W3C validation failure on ImageButton control (Server-wise)

by Jesse 18. May 2009 19:55

Recently runs into a problem on passing validation my .NET pages on W3C validator(http://validator.w3.org). Generally speaking the HTML code rendered from ImageButton control contains a invalid html tag border="0" which caused failure on passing XHTML 1.0 Transitional check.

Microsoft claimed it is not their issue, as it is not appear in "View code" of IE, which sounds more like an excuse to me. Dig several pages in google, one guy in asp.net forume suggested to use app_browser file which is working for me. Following is my w3c.browser file which sits in ~/App_Browsers folder


<browsers>
    <browser id="W3C" parentID="default">
        <identification>
            <userAgent match="^W3C_Validator" />
        </identification>

        <capture>
            <userAgent match="^W3C_Validator/(?'version'(?'major'\d+)(?'minor'\.\d+)\w*).*" />
        </capture>

        <capabilities>
          <capability name="browser" value="w3cValidator" />
          <capability name="majorversion" value="${major}" />
          <capability name="minorversion" value="${minor}" />
          <capability name="version" value="${version}" />
          <capability name="w3cdomversion" value="1.0" />
          <capability name="xml" value="true" />
          <capability name="tagWriter" value="System.Web.UI.HtmlTextWriter" />
        </capabilities>
    </browser>
</browsers>

However, there are many websites running on my server, it is not a enjoyable jobs to copy it to every website. A server-wise solution will be a big time-saver. Read the post about "Browser Definition File Schema" (http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms228122.aspx) carefully, I mean line by line and word by word. You may find following paragraph

However, if changes are made to .browser files in the %SystemRoot%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\version\CONFIG\Browsers directory, you must manually recompile the application by using the %SystemRoot%\Microsoft.NET\Framework\version\aspnet_regbrowsers.exe tool

Haha, this sounds like a server-wise solution. I copied my w3c.browser to both C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\CONFIG\Browsers and C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework64\v2.0.50727\CONFIG\Browsers, if you cannot find the second folder, you may be running on a 32 bit system, so don't need to worry about it. And the last thing needs to do

C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_regbrowsers.exe -i

The assembly will automatically installed into GAC. ^_^

Just out of curiosity, I reflected the code aspnet_regbrowsers generated. If you are a "dead cat" like me, here is the code

private bool W3cProcess(NameValueCollection headers, HttpBrowserCapabilities browserCaps)
{
    IDictionary capabilities = browserCaps.Capabilities;
    string target = browserCaps[string.Empty];
    RegexWorker worker = new RegexWorker(browserCaps);
    if (!worker.ProcessRegex(target, "^W3C_Validator"))
    {
        return false;
    }
    worker.ProcessRegex(browserCaps[string.Empty], @"^W3C_Validator/(?'version'(?'major'\d+)(?'minor'\.\d+)\w*).*");
    capabilities["browser"] = "w3cValidator";
    capabilities["majorversion"] = worker["${major}"];
    capabilities["minorversion"] = worker["${minor}"];
    capabilities["version"] = worker["${version}"];
    capabilities["w3cdomversion"] = "1.0";
    capabilities["xml"] = "true";
    capabilities["tagWriter"] = "System.Web.UI.HtmlTextWriter";
    browserCaps.AddBrowser("W3C");
    this.W3cProcessGateways(headers, browserCaps);
    bool ignoreApplicationBrowsers = false;
    this.W3cProcessBrowsers(ignoreApplicationBrowsers, headers, browserCaps);
    return true;
}

protected virtual void W3cProcessBrowsers(bool ignoreApplicationBrowsers, NameValueCollection headers, HttpBrowserCapabilities browserCaps)
{
}

protected virtual void W3cProcessGateways(NameValueCollection headers, HttpBrowserCapabilities browserCaps)
{
}

Good post about BlogEngine.NET

by Jesse 8. May 2009 11:14

BlogEngine .NET is getting interested me. Believe or not, it uses quite a lot advanced coding technic, such as MVC, provider-based model, open search, extensible api, etc.

If you are interested to know more, and you can read chinese, try the following page. or using google translate tool, you won't regret the time spending on it

http://www.cnblogs.com/Thriving-Country/archive/2008/11/14/1333739.html

Tags: , , ,
Categories: .NET | Coding | ASP .NET

Powered by BlogEngine.NET 1.5.0.7
Theme by Mads Kristensen | Modified by Mooglegiant